Cooperstown Crier - Your Source for Hometown News - Cooperstown, Baseball Hall of Fame

Book Notes

July 26, 2012

Book Notes: New best-seller: all about accountability

When Dwight Eisenhower gave his farewell address upon leaving the presidency in 1961 he warned the country of a developing “military-industrial complex.” It was a profound commentary from a lifelong military man and World War II hero. It was also a visionary statement since defense spending has exploded in this country to a point where we spend almost as much as the rest of the world combined.

When we are in a situation where our deficit reaches into the trillions each year it is proper to ask is it all worth it? Is it necessary to spend so much on defense? Has defense spending gotten the scrutiny that other parts of our budget have? Does it get a free pass because it involves the nation’s security and no one wants to question it?

These are appropriate questions and they have yet to be fully explored.

Let’s face it. The two seminal events of the 20th century as far as the military is concerned were World War II and the Vietnam War. World War II wasn’t only a triumph over evil but it ended the depression and established us as a world military and economic power. The Vietnam War was a divisive experience that literally tore this country apart.

The military and veterans of the Vietnam War were held in low esteem following that conflict. It eventually set up a situation where the military was ripe for a comeback to make up for the shame of “losing” the war, and the collective guilt the nation felt over how miserably it treated the returning veterans.

When Ronald Reagan became president in 1981 he was obsessed with national security. He wanted to cut the budget everywhere except national defense. The Pentagon was basically given a blank check to increase its budget beyond even “dream” status.

Since then the defense budget has not stopped growing. Republicans always want toput a stamp on their mantra of the party of “national security” while the Democrats don’t want to look like wimps. Accountability has taken a backseat to the image of military strength.

Even the end of the Cold War did nothing to slow down defense spending. There was talk of a “peace dividend” (where else but in Washington can you logically spend money that you don’t have on either war or peace?), but that argument went nowhere. The debate was rendered moot once terrorism became the new enemy to replace the Soviet Union.

Added to the defense buildup was the “support the troops” factor. With hindsight it was embarrassing how poorly the returning Vietnam War veterans were treated. After witnessing the horrors of war the soldiers came home to be ridiculed as outcasts.

Today the public psyche has rightfully become one where we appreciate every sacrifice they make. But the downside is that now when the government sends our GIs into a war zone the hawks use the “support the troops” banner to negate any argument against military involvement.

After 9/11 we ended up in wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Our military has been stretched so thin that many GIs have had four or five tours of duty in the war zones.

Many former army functions have been contracted out to private firms who have no accountability to the American people. The conflict in Afghanistan is costing us $2 billion a week and after 10 years it seems like perpetual war. For a country that is already running massive deficits each year, how can we continue to fund something we’re not paying for?

How we got from a country that at least tried to pay for its defense budget to one today where the “military- industrial complex” has carte blanche is intimately detailed in Rachel Maddow’s new best-seller, “Drift: The Unmooring of American Military Power.” It covers the era from World War II to Afghanistan and details how Eisenhower’s fateful warning came to fruition.

It is startling to discover how much the military has changed over the years. Maddow has managed to concisely present the historic shift in our military spending from one of accountability to one where basically anything goes. And pulling back the reins seems to have become an impossible task.

The book isn’t without flaws. The writing sometimes gets a little too convoluted causing the reader to get lost in the detail. The author also has an irritating tendency to get too “cutesy” in her writing style.

There is also the issue of the author herself who is an unabashed liberal. That bias will immediately turn off half the potential audience. Political pundits on the left and right have a bad habit of writing books to make money off their true believers.

Maddow would have been better served to have been an academic or policy wonk who no one has ever heard of.

But readers with an open mind will appreciate what Maddow has to say. She is basically giving a history lesson rather than trying to make a political statement. When our country is drowning in debt it’s important to question any spending by our government.

The questions raised by the book aren’t as much about whether we should be involved in so many foreign entanglements, but rather the process of how we got there and manage to not pay for them. It’s all about accountability and it’s something that should concern us all.

Text Only
Book Notes
  • Early 'blahs' sometimes hide a gem There are often films that sound rather "blah" when you first notice them and have no interest in seeing. It's usually due to the preview either being really stupid or the producers wanting to avoid giving away too much of the plot. If it's the latter category you must be careful. Sometimes there's a gem of a movie hidden behind the facade.

    July 24, 2014

  • 'Moneyball' author tackles Wall Street with 'Flash Boys' Have you ever read a book that feels like it's in a foreign language? It covers a subject you know is important and figure at some point it will all make sense. What do you do when that doesn't happen? Obviously, the easiest solution is to toss the book aside. But what if the underlying message is something you "get" and don't want to give up on? I faced that dilemma recently.

    July 17, 2014

  • MacNeil reading highlights novels Several weeks ago I had the good fortune to attend a talk by Robert MacNeil at the Guilderland Public Library. MacNeil is best known as the former co-host of the MacNeil/Lehrer NewsHour on PBS. He retired in 1995 but has continued to write both fiction and non-fiction. His talk at Guilderland focused on two of his novels, "Burden of Desire" written in 1992, and its sequel, "Portrait of Julia," which was published last year.

    July 10, 2014

  • 'The Monuments Men' shows important history World War II continues to hold a special place in the hearts of readers and movie goers. The reasons are many but much of it can be traced to the endless number of storylines from that conflict. There is literally a treasure trove of material that keeps emerging. The latest example is the movie, “The Monuments Men.â€�

    July 3, 2014

  • Authors not afraid to think like freaks Conventional wisdom is something we automatically take for granted. It can be something as simple as assuming there is no cure for the common cold or political polls being a good indicator of who will win an election. Common assumptions of course can be wrong but we usually just accept them as fact. However, in many cases it would be much better to think "outside the box" and consider an alternative way of looking at the world.

    June 26, 2014

  • Book goes further into Armstrong's lies There hasn't been a shortage of elite athletes that have fallen from grace in recent years. Most of them have been baseball players who have been caught using performance enhancing drugs (PEDs) and then lying about it. Golfer Tiger Woods fell from his pedestal because of extra-marital affairs. He has yet to regain his previous aura and perhaps never will. But the loudest crash of all came from cyclist Lance Armstrong who was not only a liar and a cheat but ruined other people's lives in the process.

    June 19, 2014

  • Documentary proves Butch, Sundance still enchant "Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid" is one of the most popular films of all-time. The 1969 Western is based on the real life exploits of two infamous outlaws whose specialty was robbing trains. They became folk heroes because they supposedly never shot anyone.

    June 12, 2014

  • Pohl's call-up reminds me of Feinstein book We recently learned that Cooperstown native and professional baseball player Phillip Pohl was promoted to the AAA farm team of the Oakland Athletics where he played for nearly a month. For those that don't know, AAA is the highest minor league before reaching the major leagues.

    June 5, 2014

  • Movie gives clues into real Disney Everyone has heard of Walt Disney. How can you not when Disneyland and Disney World are the most popular family vacation spots around. Add in his historic cartoons and animated features and you have a Hollywood legend. But how many people know what the man himself was like?

    May 29, 2014

  • Wooden bio by Davis feels definitive Any long-time observer of college basketball knows that one school and one coach stand out above all others. In the 1960s and 1970s the John Wooden-led UCLA Bruins won ten championships in twelve seasons. Their level of achievement is so remarkable that it will probably never be equaled. Forty years after his last championship the ghost of John Wooden still reverberates at the university.

    May 22, 2014