|
Published: July 03, 2008 08:35 am
Hawthorn Hill
By RICHARD J. deROSA
Patriotism
I have always been wary
of zealousness of any kind,
especially with respect to patriotism,
an otherwise good
and noble sentiment.
Jingoism, patriotism in
its most virulent form, nourishes
only itself, certainly
not the vital lifeblood of a nation.
After all, there is nothing
wrong and everything
right about feeling a genuine
sense of pride in one’s family,
home, and country. Each of
us is a creature of a place, despite
the genetically inspired
propensity of youth to rebel,
at least for a time, against
their essential selves, notably
parents and place. It is
impossible to escape who you
are and where you have come
from no matter how adamantly
one sticks to false illusions
about an imagined
self. Even the most ardent of
iconoclasts, deny it as one
might, exhibits the indelible
trappings of a place and its
people. The mother of a good
friend many years ago who
advised me that no matter
how hard I tried I might as
well get used to myself knew
what she was talking about.
Feeling good about one’s
country is a very good thing.
When I say that I am proud
to be an American, that does
not imply a blind and
thoughtless acceptance of
our government’s actions
and policies. All too often, we
forget that responsible dissent
is a core democratic
principle, one not to be taken
lightly. If ever we abridge
our freedoms of thought and
speech, we will have lost everything
we stand for as a
nation.
When I am weeding or
transplanting lettuce starts,
I would rather be replaying a
piano exercise that has been
causing me some difficulty (a
tough row to hoe at 64!) or
thinking about an upcoming
canoe trip than to be burdened
by what I see as the
most pernicious of tendencies
in this country, the obsession
with being number
one. Unfortunately, in addition
to consumerism, it seems
to be a rather infectious and
rapidly spreading phenomenon.
Why is it so important
to be number one? What is
wrong with simply being who
and what you are and appreciating
that without denigrating
others, be they individuals
or countries? I am
quite capable of being quite
proud of this wonderful nation,
its people, and its incredible
accomplishments
without belittling other cultures
or countries merely because
they go about the business
of living differently.
I have been fortunate
enough to have seen a fair
share of the world. Every
country that I have visited
has had a lot to be proud of.
There is no such place as the
best country on earth. Rather,
there are many countries
comprised of many cultures,
each a unique expression of
place. That is what makes
this such a fascinating, if
perpetually mysterious,
planet to spend a bit of time
on.
This past week I spent
more time than I should have
watching the European soccer
tournament. It is, as the
Brazilians have so labeled it,
“the beautiful game.” Spain
won the tournament by playing
their version of that
game. As exciting as the play
was, what moved me most
were the tears shed by individual
players as their national
anthems were being
played. As the camera
panned the sprawling
crowds, few dry faces could
be seen no matter what anthem
might have been playing.
These were tears of pride
for team and for country.
That every citizen of every
country of the world feels a
sense of pride in her nation
is as it should be.
One of the things that is
so edifying about travel is experiencing
how others do
things. It does not take long
to discover that as good as
we are at some things, we
are not the best at everything,
nor should we be. Just
as visitors to this country
learn a great deal and often
take away some good ideas,
be they technological, cultural,
or political, we too, if our
minds are open, can come
away from visits to foreign
lands with greater insights
into how to live our lives in
ways far more compatible
with healing and then sustaining
a healthy planet. In
our travels, we have encountered
methods and attitudes
far more compatible with responsible
environmental
stewardship than is most often
the case here.
Having read countless reports
of high-level meetings
between our representatives
and those of other nations,
our intolerance of difference
has always astounded me.
Our Secretary of State not
too long ago insisted that we
were quite willing to meet
with the leaders of Iran so
long as they, in effect, did everything
we have told them
they must do. There has been
quite a bit of debate during
the recent primaries about
whether or not it is a good
idea to sit down to chat with
one’s enemies, if indeed that
is what they are. I have never
quite figured out a logic
that sees continued tension,
back and forth threats, and
the very real possibility of
bloodshed preferable to chats
in comfortable armchairs often
followed by, if not progress,
a deepened understanding
of differences. Such an
approach is rooted in what I
alluded to at the start of this
essay: patriotism rooted in
condescension and unfounded
moral superiority.
There are certain times
and moments when my eyes
water and I feel a deep sense
of camaraderie with fellow
veterans or when while
watching a film someone
does or says something that
pushes my patriotism button.
As pure and genuine a
feeling as it is, it is never felt
at the expense of someone
else’s equally heartfelt sense
of national pride.
|
|